Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. That does not change the verdict. Read the full disclosure

Intermediate18 minPerplexityResearchUpdated 2026-09-16

Perplexity Collections (now Projects): reusable research workspace (2026)

Many people still search for «Perplexity Collections», but the current product is called Projects (formerly Spaces). The official guide is at https://www.perplexity.ai/help-center/en/articles/10352961-what-are-spaces. If you already ran the research-with-sources flow, a Project is the next step: a persistent workspace where you group threads on the same topic, optionally with instructions and files, so you can return tomorrow without digging through History. It does not replace opening sources. It holds the map.

The problem it solves

Without Projects, every good search sinks into History. You paste answers into a doc and lose the thread with its citations. Or worse: you ask again and mix contexts. A Project used badly is a chat dump; used well, it is the index of a topic that lasts days.

What you will learn

  • Decide when a topic deserves a Project and not a loose thread
  • Create a Project from the sidebar with a name and instructions
  • Run searches as threads inside the Project
  • Move existing threads from History into the Project
  • Organize several queries and, if needed, add files
  • Return to sources and draft a brief outside Perplexity

Before you start

  • An account at https://www.perplexity.ai
  • At least one round of the perplexity-investigacion-con-fuentes tutorial
  • A real topic you will revisit over several days — not «best AI tools»
  • 18 minutes and a separate doc for the final brief
  1. Steps 1

    Decide whether the topic deserves a Project

    Before you create anything, ask: will you run more than two queries on the same subject in the next week? For a one-off question, stay on a loose thread and open sources as in the previous tutorial. For a product brief, a new market, or a report that grows over several sessions, use a Project. Write the scope in one line: topic, geography if it matters, and the work's deadline.

    What you should see: A one-line scope in a notes app. A clear decision: Project yes or loose thread.

  2. Steps 2

    Open Projects and create a new one

    In Perplexity, open Projects in the left sidebar. Click + New project (you can also use the + hover option on the Projects header). Use a concrete title: «Product LLM criteria 2025-2026», not «Research». If there is a description field, note what decision this material will support. In the Project's Settings tab, if Instructions appears, paste analyst rules: «Split fact, estimate and opinion. Ask for a date on each source. Do not write the final essay.» Perplexity can also suggest a title and instructions if you create a Project from an existing session.

    What you should see: An empty Project with a specific title. A Settings tab with Instructions if your account shows them.

  3. Steps 3

    Start the first thread inside the Project

    With the Project open, write the first question from there — not from the global home box if you can avoid it. Use the analyst formula: a narrow question, a year, exclusions. Example: «What criteria did product teams publish in 2025-2026 for choosing an LLM in Europe, and which trade-offs do they name? Exclude affiliate lists.» Ask for 5-7 dated sources before you ask for conclusions. Each search inside the Project is saved as a thread (session) in the Project list.

    What you should see: A new thread listed inside the Project, with numbered citations in the answer.

  4. Steps 4

    Add a thread you already had in History

    If you started outside the Project, do not throw it away. Open the thread from History in the sidebar, click the three-dot menu, and choose Add it to a project (Perplexity's help center documents this wording). Select the Project you created. The thread keeps its messages and citations; only its logical folder inside Perplexity changes.

    What you should see: A brief confirmation and the thread visible in the Project list.

  5. Steps 5

    Organize a second query without mixing the topic

    Inside the same Project, open a new thread (do not stretch the first one if the question is different). Second-round example: «Of those sources, which mention cost per token or latency as a decisive criterion?» or «What could you not verify in the previous round?» Each thread has a role. You can Pin important Projects for quick access. Avoid one chat with ten follow-ups that mix sub-questions.

    What you should see: Two or three threads in the Project, each with a title that describes its role.

  6. Steps 6

    Optional: Project files and instructions

    If the topic needs it, upload reference files in the Project's Files tab (PDF, CSV, etc.). Project instructions apply to new searches inside it. Perplexity's plan documentation states that the Individual Pro plan allows up to 50 persistent file uploads per Project; on Free, upload limits are lower and share a rolling weekly allowance — check the help center before a deadline. Files add context; they do not replace opening web sources cited in a thread.

    What you should see: Files tab with one or two documents and Settings with Instructions visible.

  7. Steps 7

    Return to sources and draft the brief elsewhere

    Open the thread that matters most. Same as perplexity-investigacion-con-fuentes: pick two primary sources, note title, author and date in your external doc. The Project brings you back to the thread with its citations; it does not replace reading the PDF or report. In your doc, write: thesis in one sentence, 4-6 bullets citing the sources you opened, a Gaps section, brief date. The Project stays as your thread index for the next session.

    What you should see: Two source tabs open, dated notes elsewhere, and the Project with readable threads as the map.

Real use cases

Market research across three sessions

Round 1: criteria map. Round 2: gaps. Round 3: a new competitor. The Project avoids re-explaining context each time.

A weekly brief that gets updated

One Project per meeting topic. Each Monday a new thread with the date in the title; the brief comes from opened sources, not the chat.

Onboarding to a technical topic

Several threads with fixed instructions («explain like to a PM, cite papers with year»). The Project is the course; the sources are the required reading.

Common mistakes

  • Using the Project as a dump

    Saving every search with no title or criterion. In a month you will not know which thread mattered.

  • Skipping sources because «it is already saved»

    Saving the thread verifies nothing. The deliverable still needs title, author and date from primary sources.

  • Mixing topics in one Project

    Pricing and regulation in the same place confuse instructions and threads. Split into two Projects.

  • Searching for «Collections» and not finding the button

    The current product is Projects in the sidebar. Older guides that say Collections or Spaces describe the same workflow under an older name.

Close

If you looked for Collections, the path today is Projects: threads on the same topic, optional instructions, and an index you can return to without losing the map. Sources still open elsewhere; the brief is written somewhere else. It is day two of the sources flow: same rigor, less friction between sessions.

Next steps

  1. Run perplexity-investigacion-con-fuentes again with a narrower question inside your Project.
  2. If the final piece is long, edit it by section with claude-escritura-larga.
  3. For deliverable formatting, use chatgpt-primeros-pasos with your brief already dated.

Free guide

Want the 15-tools guide?

We send it free. We will also ping you when the next guide in this path goes out.

Unsubscribe whenever you want. We do not sell the list.

Tools in this guide

Read next

You may also like